Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluating the ovarian cancer gonadotropin hypothesis: A candidate gene study

  • Alice W. Lee
  • , Jonathan P. Tyrer
  • , Jennifer A. Doherty
  • , Douglas A. Stram
  • , Jolanta Kupryjanczyk
  • , Agnieszka Dansonka-Mieszkowska
  • , Joanna Plisiecka-Halasa
  • , Beata Spiewankiewicz
  • , Emily J. Myers
  • , Georgia Chenevix-Trench
  • , Peter A. Fasching
  • , Matthias W. Beckmann
  • , Arif B. Ekici
  • , Alexander Hein
  • , Ignace Vergote
  • , Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
  • , Diether Lambrechts
  • , Kristine G. Wicklund
  • , Ursula Eilber
  • , Shan Wang-Gohrke
  • Jenny Chang-Claude, Anja Rudolph, Lara Sucheston-Campbell, Kunle Odunsi, Kirsten B. Moysich, Yurii B. Shvetsov, Pamela J. Thompson, Marc T. Goodman, Lynne R. Wilkens, Thilo Dörk, Peter Hillemanns, Matthias Dürst, Ingo B. Runnebaum, Natalia Bogdanova, Liisa M. Pelttari, Heli Nevanlinna, Arto Leminen, Robert P. Edwards, Joseph L. Kelley, Philipp Harter, Ira Schwaab, Florian Heitz, Andreas Du Bois, Sandra Orsulic, Jenny Lester, Christine Walsh, Beth Y. Karlan, Estrid Hogdall, Susanne K. Kjaer, Allan Jensen, Robert A. Vierkant, Julie M. Cunningham, Ellen L. Goode, Brooke L. Fridley, Melissa C. Southey, Graham G. Giles, Fiona Bruinsma, Xifeng Wu, Michelle A.T. Hildebrandt, Karen Lu, Dong Liang, Maria Bisogna, Douglas A. Levine, Rachel Palmieri Weber, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Edwin S. Iversen, Andrew Berchuck, Kathryn L. Terry, Daniel W. Cramer, Shelley S. Tworoger, Elizabeth M. Poole, Sara H. Olson, Irene Orlow, Elisa V. Bandera, Line Bjorge, Ingvild L. Tangen, Helga B. Salvesen, Camilla Krakstad, Leon F.A.G. Massuger, Lambertus A. Kiemeney, Katja K.H. Aben, Anne M. Van Altena, Yukie Bean, Tanja Pejovic, Melissa Kellar, Nhu D. Le, Linda S. Cook, Linda E. Kelemen, Angela Brooks-Wilson, Jan Lubinski, Jacek Gronwald, Cezary Cybulski, Anna Jakubowska, Nicolas Wentzensen, Louise A. Brinton, Jolanta Lissowska, Hannah Yang, Lotte Nedergaard, Lene Lundvall, Claus Hogdall, Honglin Song, Ian G. Campbell, Diana Eccles, Rosalind Glasspool, Nadeem Siddiqui, Karen Carty, James Paul, Iain A. McNeish, Weiva Sieh, Valerie McGuire, Joseph H. Rothstein, Alice S. Whittemore, John R. McLaughlin, Harvey A. Risch, Catherine M. Phelan, Hoda Anton-Culver, Argyrios Ziogas, Usha Menon, Susan J. Ramus, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj, Patricia Harrington, Malcolm C. Pike, Francesmary Modugno, Mary Anne Rossing, Roberta B. Ness, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Daniel O. Stram, Anna H. Wu, Celeste Leigh Pearce
  • University of Southern California
  • University of Cambridge
  • Dartmouth College
  • Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology
  • Queensland Institute of Medical Research
  • Peter Maccallum Cancer Centre
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg
  • KU Leuven
  • Flanders Institute for Biotechnology
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • German Cancer Research Center
  • Ulm University
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  • University of Hawai'i at Mānoa
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • Hannover Medical School
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena
  • University of Helsinki
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Kliniken Essen-Mitte
  • Dr. Horst Schmidt Klinik GmbH
  • Institut für Humangenetik Wiesbaden
  • Danish Cancer Society
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • University of Kansas
  • University of Melbourne
  • Cancer Council Victoria
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • Texas Southern University
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Duke University
  • Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Harvard University
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
  • University of Bergen
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Comprehensive Cancer Center the Netherlands
  • Oregon Health and Science University
  • Provincial Health Services Authority
  • University of New Mexico
  • Alberta Health Services
  • University of Calgary
  • Simon Fraser University
  • Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Glasgow
  • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
  • Stanford University
  • University of Toronto
  • Yale University
  • Moffitt Cancer Center
  • University of California at Irvine
  • University College London
  • University of Washington
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Ovarian cancer is a hormone-related disease with a strong genetic basis. However, none of its high-penetrance susceptibility genes and GWAS-identified variants to date are known to be involved in hormonal pathways. Given the hypothesized etiologic role of gonadotropins, an assessment of how variability in genes involved in the gonadotropin signaling pathway impacts disease risk is warranted. Methods: Genetic data from 41 ovarian cancer study sites were pooled and unconditional logistic regression was used to evaluate whether any of the 2185 SNPs from 11 gonadotropin signaling pathway genes was associated with ovarian cancer risk. A burden test using the admixture likelihood (AML) method was also used to evaluate gene-level associations. Results: We did not find any genome-wide significant associations between individual SNPs and ovarian cancer risk. However, there was some suggestion of gene-level associations for four gonadotropin signaling pathway genes: INHBB (p = 0.045, mucinous), LHCGR (p = 0.046, high-grade serous), GNRH (p = 0.041, high-grade serous), and FSHB (p = 0.036, overall invasive). There was also suggestive evidence for INHA (p = 0.060, overall invasive). Conclusions: Ovarian cancer studies have limited sample numbers, thus fewer genome-wide susceptibility alleles, with only modest associations, have been identified relative to breast and prostate cancers. We have evaluated the majority of ovarian cancer studies with biological samples, to our knowledge, leaving no opportunity for replication. Using both our understanding of biology and powerful gene-level tests, we have identified four putative ovarian cancer loci near INHBB, LHCGR, GNRH, and FSHB that warrant a second look if larger sample sizes and denser genotype chips become available.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)542-548
Number of pages7
JournalGynecologic Oncology
Volume136
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

Keywords

  • Gene
  • Genetic variation
  • Genetics
  • Gonadotropins
  • Ovarian cancer
  • Polymorphisms

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the ovarian cancer gonadotropin hypothesis: A candidate gene study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this