Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluating the outcomes of plans: Theory, practice, and methodology

  • Lucie Laurian
  • , Jan Crawford
  • , Maxine Day
  • , Peter Kouwenhoven
  • , Greg Mason
  • , Neil Ericksen
  • , Lee Beattie
  • Planning Consultants Ltd
  • University of Waikato
  • Inform Planning Ltd
  • The University of Auckland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

129 Scopus citations

Abstract

Despite calls for performance-oriented and evidence-based planning, the outcomes of land use and environmental plans are rarely monitored or assessed ex post facto (that is, post implementation). As a result, planners cannot know whether or why plans achieve their goals, or learn from the results of past interventions to improve planning practice. This evaluation gap is caused by a lack of methodology to evaluate the outcomes of plans and the difficulty of attributing changes to planning activities. We address this gap by proposing and testing a plan-outcome evaluation (POE) methodology. We demonstrate its broad applicability and usefulness in the context of local plans in New Zealand. The POE methodology will be useful to practitioners and academics seeking to assess the outcomes of plans in countries with western planning traditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)740-757
Number of pages18
JournalEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Design
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the outcomes of plans: Theory, practice, and methodology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this