Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Estimation of the steady-state volume of distribution for digoxin: A comparison of model-independent methods with a two-compartment model in healthy volunteers

  • J. M. de Vito
  • , R. E. Crass
  • , R. A. Blum
  • , R. A. Pleasants
  • , J. J. Schentag
  • Women and Children's Hospital of Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Digoxin serum concentration vs. time data have been described in the literature by a linear two-compartment model. When calculating the steady-state volume of distribution for digoxin after oral dosing, a computer fitting program is often used because of the complex first-order absorption, two-compartment model employed. Since computer programs are not always available, we computed and compared the steady-state volume of distribution/bioavailability for digoxin using both a model-independent (area) and compartmental approach. Six healthy subjects participated in the study; each received digoxin 0.2 mg in capsule form daily for ten days. The mean steady-state volume of distribution/bioavailability calculated by noncompartmental analysis was 785 L and the mean for compartmental analysis was 784 L. The small difference between methods suggests that area analysis offers a simpler alternative to computerized compartmental fitting to determine this parameter for digoxin.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)837-839
Number of pages3
JournalDrug Intelligence and Clinical Pharmacy
Volume19
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1985

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimation of the steady-state volume of distribution for digoxin: A comparison of model-independent methods with a two-compartment model in healthy volunteers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this