Abstract
Digoxin serum concentration vs. time data have been described in the literature by a linear two-compartment model. When calculating the steady-state volume of distribution for digoxin after oral dosing, a computer fitting program is often used because of the complex first-order absorption, two-compartment model employed. Since computer programs are not always available, we computed and compared the steady-state volume of distribution/bioavailability for digoxin using both a model-independent (area) and compartmental approach. Six healthy subjects participated in the study; each received digoxin 0.2 mg in capsule form daily for ten days. The mean steady-state volume of distribution/bioavailability calculated by noncompartmental analysis was 785 L and the mean for compartmental analysis was 784 L. The small difference between methods suggests that area analysis offers a simpler alternative to computerized compartmental fitting to determine this parameter for digoxin.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 837-839 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Drug Intelligence and Clinical Pharmacy |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1985 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Estimation of the steady-state volume of distribution for digoxin: A comparison of model-independent methods with a two-compartment model in healthy volunteers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver