Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Equitable infrastructure: Achieving resilient systems and restorative justice through policy and research innovation

  • Jason P. Giovannettone
  • , Gregg P. Macey
  • , Amir AghaKouchak
  • , Michele Barbato
  • , William J. Capehart
  • , Auroop R. Ganguly
  • , Mital Hall
  • , Jennifer F. Helgeson
  • , Si Han Li
  • , Teng Wu
  • , Guirong Yan
  • , Farshid Vahedifard
  • Inc.
  • University of California at Irvine
  • Brooklyn Law School
  • United Nations University Institute for Water
  • University of California at Davis
  • South Dakota School of Mines & Technology
  • Northeastern University
  • Windermere
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology
  • Rowan Williams Davies and Irwin Inc.
  • Missouri University of Science and Technology
  • Tufts University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recent major investments in infrastructure in the United States and globally present a crucial opportunity to embed equity within the heart of resilient infrastructure decision-making. Yet there is a notable absence of frameworks within the engineering and scientific fields for integrating equity into planning, design, and maintenance of infrastructure. Additionally, whole-of-government approaches to infrastructure, including the Justice40 Initiative, mimic elements of process management that support exploitative rather than exploratory innovation. These and other policies risk creating innovation traps that limit analytical and engineering advances necessary to prioritize equity in decision-making, identification and disruption of mechanisms that cause or contribute to inequities, and remediation of historic harms. Here, we propose a three-tiered framework toward equitable and resilient infrastructure through restorative justice, incremental policy innovation, and exploratory research innovation. This framework aims to ensure equitable access and benefits of infrastructure, minimize risk disparities, and embrace restorative justice to repair historical and systemic inequities. We outline incremental policy innovation and exploratory research action items to address and mitigate risk disparities, emphasizing the need for community-engaged research and the development of equity metrics. Among other action items, we recommend a certification system—referred to as Social, Environmental, and Economic Development (SEED)—to train infrastructure engineers and planners and ensure attentiveness to gaps that exist within and dynamically interact across each tier of the proposed framework. Through the framework and proposed actions, we advocate for a transformative vision for equitable infrastructure that emphasizes the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technical dimensions in infrastructure planning, design, and maintenance.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberpgae157
JournalPNAS Nexus
Volume3
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2024

Keywords

  • climate change adaptation
  • economic development (SEED) certification
  • environmental
  • equitable infrastructure
  • resilient infrastructure
  • restorative justice
  • social

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Equitable infrastructure: Achieving resilient systems and restorative justice through policy and research innovation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this