Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Electrodiagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome in the International GBS Outcome Study: Differences in methods and reference values

  • the IGOS Consortium
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Haga Ziekenhuis
  • Université catholique de Louvain
  • Utrecht University
  • King's College Hospital
  • International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh
  • Chiba University
  • Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires
  • University of Malaya
  • University of Rome "sapienza,"
  • Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille
  • University of Milan - Bicocca
  • Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center
  • Ospedale Valduce
  • Columbia University
  • Saarland University
  • Mvz Pfalzklinikum
  • L'Hospitalet Del Llobregat
  • National Taiwan University
  • University of Kansas
  • Hospital Frances
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
  • Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía
  • Aarhus University
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital
  • University of Cologne
  • University of Naples Federico II
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata
  • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago
  • Nantes Université
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
  • St. Joseph's Regional Medical Center, Paterson
  • University of Duisburg-Essen
  • Gabriele d'Annunzio University
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • Lahey Hospital and Medical Center
  • University of Vermont
  • Jining Medical College
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Johns Hopkins University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To describe the heterogeneity of electrodiagnostic (EDx) studies in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) patients collected as part of the International GBS Outcome Study (IGOS). Methods: Prospectively collected clinical and EDx data were available in 957 IGOS patients from 115 centers. Only the first EDx study was included in the current analysis. Results: Median timing of the EDx study was 7 days (interquartile range 4–11) from symptom onset. Methodology varied between centers, countries and regions. Reference values from the responding 103 centers were derived locally in 49%, from publications in 37% and from a combination of these in the remaining 15%. Amplitude measurement in the EDx studies (baseline-to-peak or peak-to-peak) differed from the way this was done in the reference values, in 22% of motor and 39% of sensory conduction. There was marked variability in both motor and sensory reference values, although only a few outliers accounted for this. Conclusions: Our study showed extensive variation in the clinical practice of EDx in GBS patients among IGOS centers across the regions. Significance: Besides EDx variation in GBS patients participating in IGOS, this diversity is likely to be present in other neuromuscular disorders and centers. This underlines the need for standardization of EDx in future multinational GBS studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-240
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Neurophysiology
Volume138
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2022

Keywords

  • AIDP
  • AMAN
  • AMSAN
  • Electromyography
  • Nerve conduction studies
  • Reference values

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Electrodiagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome in the International GBS Outcome Study: Differences in methods and reference values'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this