Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effects of using two- versus three-dimensional computational modeling of fluidized beds. Part I, hydrodynamics

  • Iowa State University
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

159 Scopus citations

Abstract

Simulations of fluidized beds are performed to study and determine the effect on the use of coordinate systems and geometrical configurations to model fluidized bed reactors. Computational fluid dynamics is employed for an Eulerian-Eulerian model, which represents each phase as an interspersed continuum. The transport equation for granular temperature is solved and a hyperbolic tangent function is used to provide a smooth transition between the plastic and viscous regimes for the solid phase. The aim of the present work is to show the range of validity for employing simulations based on a 2D Cartesian coordinate system to approximate both cylindrical and rectangular fluidized beds. Three different fluidization regimes, bubbling, slugging and turbulent regimes, are investigated and the results of 2D and 3D simulations are presented for both cylindrical and rectangular domains. The results demonstrate that a 2D Cartesian system can be used to successfully simulate and predict a bubbling regime. However, caution must be exercised when using 2D Cartesian coordinates for other fluidized regimes. A budget analysis that explains all the differences in detail is presented in Part II [N. Xie, F. Battaglia, S. Pannala, Effects of Using Two-Versus Three-Dimensional Computational Modeling of Fluidized Beds: Part II, budget analysis, 182 (1) (2007) 14] to complement the hydrodynamic theory of this paper.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalPowder Technology
Volume182
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 15 2008

Keywords

  • Computational fluid dynamics
  • Fluidization
  • Gas-solid flow
  • Hydrodynamics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of using two- versus three-dimensional computational modeling of fluidized beds. Part I, hydrodynamics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this