Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effect of quantitative feedback on student performance on the National Board Medical Examination in an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship

  • University of Wisconsin-Madison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether regular quantitative feedback improved medical student performance on the National Board of Medical Examiners Obstetrics and Gynecology subject test. Study Design: We examined the effect of including regular quantitative feedback (in the form of biweekly quizzes) in the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship on student performance on the National Board of Medical Examiners Obstetrics and Gynecology examination at the University at Buffalo. Results: Students who completed the clerkship format including the regular feedback scored significantly higher than students who completed the clerkship without feedback (70.3 ± 7.1 vs 68.2 ± 8.6; P < .005; mean ± SD; t test). The number of students failing the examination was significantly reduced from 6.39% to 0.47% (χ2 test; P < .001). Conclusion: Introduction of regular quantitative feedback significantly improved student performance on the National Board of Medical Examiners test, and resulted in a significant decrease in the number of students failing the course.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)530.e1-530.e5
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume197
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Keywords

  • clerkship
  • medical student education
  • national board of medical examiners
  • obstetrics and gynecology
  • undergraduate

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of quantitative feedback on student performance on the National Board Medical Examination in an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this