Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effect of oxygen on ascorbic acid uptake and concentration in embryonic chick brain

  • Western University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

The effects of oxygen on ascorbic acid concentration and transport were studied in chick embryo (Gallus gallus domesticus). During normoxic incubations, plasma ascorbic acid concentration peaked on fetal day 12 and then fell, before increasing again on day 20 when pulmonary respiration began. In contrast, cerebral ascorbic acid concentration rose after day 6, was maintained at a relatively high level during days 8-18, and then fell significantly by day 20. Exposure of day 16 embryos for 48 h to 42% ambient O2 concentration decreased ascorbic acid concentration by four-fifths in plasma and by one-half in brain, compared to values in normoxic (21% O2) or hypoxic (15% O2) controls. Hyperoxic preincubation of embryos also inhibited ascorbic acid transport, as evidenced by decreased initial rates of saturable and Na+-dependent [14C]ascorbic acid uptake into isolated brain cells. It may be concluded that changes in ascorbic acid concentration occur in response to oxidative stress, consistent with a role for the vitamin in the detoxification of oxygen radicals in fetal tissues. However, changing O2 levels have less effect on ascorbic acid concentration in brain than in plasma, indicating regulation of the vitamin by brain cells. Furthermore, the effect of hyperoxia on cerebral vitamin C may result, in part, from inhibition of cellular ascorbic acid transport.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)571-576
Number of pages6
JournalNeurochemical Research
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1992

Keywords

  • Ascorbic acid
  • cell transport
  • embryonic brain
  • Gallus gallus donesticus
  • oxygen

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of oxygen on ascorbic acid uptake and concentration in embryonic chick brain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this