TY - GEN
T1 - Dynamic establishment of protection paths in WDM networks, part I
AU - Anand, Vishal
AU - Qiao, Chunming
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2000 IEEE
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - In wavelength division multiplexed networks (WDM) with 1:l path protection, a link-disjoint protection (backup) path is also set up at the time of setting up a working (primary) path. Hence, the failum of a single fiber-link does not cause huge data losses. This paper considers on-line routing and wavelength assignment (RWA) of protection paths in such networks. In particular, we study two strategies based on the 1:l path protection scheme. The Static strategy establishes protection paths such that once a route and wavelength have been chosen, they are not allowed to change. On the other hand, the Dynamicstrategy allows for re-arrangement of protection paths, that is, both the route and wavelength chosen for a protection path can change so as to accommodate a new request. With either strategy, we assume that the working paths cannot be re-arranged. This is to prevent the disruption of on-going traffic. The two strategies are compared on the basis of the number of connectionsrequests that can be satisfied for a given number of wavelengths, assuming that the requests come one at a time, and wavelengths are assigned according to the First-Fit policy. One of the results of our study is that, contrary to intuition, the Static strategy performs better than the Dynamic strategy.
AB - In wavelength division multiplexed networks (WDM) with 1:l path protection, a link-disjoint protection (backup) path is also set up at the time of setting up a working (primary) path. Hence, the failum of a single fiber-link does not cause huge data losses. This paper considers on-line routing and wavelength assignment (RWA) of protection paths in such networks. In particular, we study two strategies based on the 1:l path protection scheme. The Static strategy establishes protection paths such that once a route and wavelength have been chosen, they are not allowed to change. On the other hand, the Dynamicstrategy allows for re-arrangement of protection paths, that is, both the route and wavelength chosen for a protection path can change so as to accommodate a new request. With either strategy, we assume that the working paths cannot be re-arranged. This is to prevent the disruption of on-going traffic. The two strategies are compared on the basis of the number of connectionsrequests that can be satisfied for a given number of wavelengths, assuming that the requests come one at a time, and wavelengths are assigned according to the First-Fit policy. One of the results of our study is that, contrary to intuition, the Static strategy performs better than the Dynamic strategy.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85116406627
U2 - 10.1109/ICCCN.2000.885491
DO - 10.1109/ICCCN.2000.885491
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85116406627
T3 - Proceedings - International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, ICCCN
SP - 198
EP - 204
BT - Proceedings - 9th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, ICCCN 2000
A2 - Engbersen, Ton
A2 - Park, E. K.
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 9th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, ICCCN 2000
Y2 - 16 October 2000 through 18 October 2000
ER -