Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dose, schedule, safety, and efficacy of guadecitabine in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

  • Gail J. Roboz
  • , Hagop M. Kantarjian
  • , Karen W.L. Yee
  • , Patricia L. Kropf
  • , Casey L. O'Connell
  • , Elizabeth A. Griffiths
  • , Wendy Stock
  • , Naval G. Daver
  • , Elias Jabbour
  • , Ellen K. Ritchie
  • , Katherine J. Walsh
  • , David Rizzieri
  • , Scott D. Lunin
  • , Tania Curio
  • , Woonbok Chung
  • , Yong Hao
  • , James N. Lowder
  • , Mohammad Azab
  • , Jean Pierre J. Issa
  • New York Presbyterian Hospital
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • University Health Network
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center
  • University of Southern California
  • The University of Chicago
  • Ohio State University
  • Duke University
  • Florida Cancer Specialist and Research Institute
  • Temple University
  • Astex Pharmaceuticals

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

62 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are poor. Guadecitabine, a next-generation hypomethylating agent, could be useful in treating such patients. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, phase 2 dose-expansion study, AML patients from 10 North American medical centers were first randomized (1:1) to receive subcutaneous guadecitabine at 60 or 90 mg/m2 on 5 consecutive days in each 28-day cycle (5-day regimen). Subsequently, another cohort was treated for 10 days with 60 mg/m2 (10-day regimen). RESULTS: Between June 15, 2012, and August 19, 2013, 108 patients with previously treated AML consented to enroll in the study, and 103 of these patients were treated; 5 patients did not receive the study treatment. A total of 103 patients were included in the safety and efficacy analyses (24 and 26 patients who were randomly assigned to 60 and 90 mg/m2/d, respectively [5-day regimen] and 53 patients who were assigned to 60 mg/m2/d [10-day regimen]). The 90 mg/m2 dose showed no benefit in clinical outcomes in comparison with 60 mg/m2 in the randomized cohort. Composite complete response (CRc) and complete response (CR) rates were higher with the 10-day regimen versus the 5-day regimen (CRc, 30.2% vs 16.0%; P =.1061; CR, 18.9% vs 8%; P =.15). Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) were mainly hematologic, with a higher incidence on the 10-day regimen. Early all-cause mortality was low and similar between regimens. Twenty patients (8 on the 5-day regimen and 12 on the 10-day regimen) were bridged to hematopoietic cell transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Guadecitabine has promising clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile and thus warrants further development in this population. Cancer 2018;124:325-34.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)325-334
Number of pages10
JournalCancer
Volume124
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 15 2018

Keywords

  • acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
  • guadecitabine
  • refractory
  • relapsed
  • SGI-110

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dose, schedule, safety, and efficacy of guadecitabine in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this