Abstract
We entered the CAPRI experiment during the middle of Round 4 and have submitted predictions for all 6 targets released since then. We used the following procedures for docking prediction: (1) the identification of possible binding region (s) of a target based on known biological information, (2) rigid-body sampling around the binding region(s) by using the docking program ZDOCK, (3) ranking of the sampled complex conformations by employing the DFIRE-based statistical energy function, (4) clustering based on pairwise root-mean-square distance and the DFIRE energy, and (5) manual inspection and relaxation of the side-chain conformations of the top-ranked structures by geometric constraint. Reasonable predictions were made for 4 of the 6 targets. The best fraction of native contacts within the top 10 models are 89.1% for Target 12, 54.3% for Target 13, 29.3% for Target 14, and 94.1% for Target 18. The origin of successes and failures is discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 314-318 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 1 2005 |
Keywords
- CAPRI
- Docking
- Knowledge-based potential
- Protein-protein interaction
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Docking prediction using biological information, ZDOCK sampling technique, and clustering guided by the DFIRE statistical energy function'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver