Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Do high-status people really have fewer children? Education, income, and fertility in the contemporary U.S

  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Arizona State University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

88 Scopus citations

Abstract

Evolutionary discussions regarding the relationship between social status and fertility in the contemporary U.S. typically claim that the relationship is either negative or absent entirely. The published data on recent generations of Americans upon which such statements rest, however, are solid with respect to women but sparse and equivocal for men. In the current study, we investigate education and income in relation to age at first child, childlessness, and number of children for men and women in two samples - one of the general American population and one of graduates of an elite American university. We find that increased education is strongly associated with delayed childbearing in both sexes and is also moderately associated with decreased completed or near-completed fertility. Women in the general population with higher adult income have fewer children, but this relationship does not hold within all educational groups, including our sample with elite educations. Higher-income men, however, do not have fewer children in the general population and in fact have lower childlessness rates. Further, higher income in men is positively associated with fertility among our sample with elite educations as well as within the general population among those with college educations. Such findings undermine simple statements on the relationship between status and fertility.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)377-392
Number of pages16
JournalHuman Nature
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Keywords

  • Education
  • Fertility
  • Income
  • Status

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do high-status people really have fewer children? Education, income, and fertility in the contemporary U.S'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this