Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Do clinicians want recommendations? A multicenter study comparing evidence summaries with and without GRADE recommendations

  • Ignacio Neumann
  • , Pablo Alonso-Coello
  • , Per Olav Vandvik
  • , Thomas Agoritsas
  • , Gemma Mas
  • , Elie A. Akl
  • , Romina Brignardello-Petersen
  • , Jose Emparanza
  • , Lauren McCullagh
  • , Catherine De Sitio
  • , Thomas McGinn
  • , Hind Almodaimegh
  • , Khalid Almodaimegh
  • , Solange Rivera
  • , Luis Rojas
  • , Jérôme Stirnemann
  • , Jihad Irani
  • , Sani Hlais
  • , Reem Mustafa
  • , Fadi Bdair
  • Abdelrahman Aly, Annette Kristiansen, Ariel Izcovich, Anggie Ramirez, Jan Brozek, Gordon Guyatt, Holger J. Schünemann
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
  • Research Institute of the Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital
  • Innlandet Hospital Trust
  • University of Geneva
  • American University of Beirut
  • Universidad de Chile
  • Hospital Universitario Donostia
  • Northwell Health System
  • King Abdulaziz Medical City - Riyadh
  • Al-Iman Hospital
  • University of Balamand
  • University of Missouri at Kansas City
  • Mosaic Life Care
  • University of Oslo
  • Hospital Alemán
  • International Health Central American Institute Foundation & Cochrane Central America & Spanish Caribbean Branch of the Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre
  • McMaster University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines provide recommendations to assist clinicians in decision-making and to reduce the gap between best current research evidence and clinical practice. However, some argue that providing preappraised evidence summaries alone, rather than recommendations, is more appropriate. The objective of the study is to evaluate clinicians’ preferences, and understanding of the evidence and intended course of action in response to evidence summaries with and without recommendations. Study Design Setting: We included practicing clinicians attending educational sessions across 10 countries. Clinicians were randomized to receive relevant clinical scenarios supported by research evidence of low or very low certainty and accompanied by either strong or weak recommendations developed with the GRADE system. Within each group, participants were further randomized to receive the recommendation plus the corresponding evidence summary or the evidence summary alone. We evaluated participants’ preferences and understanding for the presentation strategy, as well as their intended course of action. Results: One hundred eighty-nine of 219 (86%) and 201 of 248 (81%) participants preferred having recommendations accompanying evidence summaries for both strong and weak recommendations, respectively. Across all scenarios, less than half of participants correctly interpreted information provided in the evidences summaries (e.g., estimates of effect, certainty in the research evidence). The presence of a recommendation resulted in a more appropriate intended course of action for two scenarios involving strong recommendations. Conclusion: Evidence summaries alone are not enough to impact clinicians’ course of action. Clinicians clearly prefer having recommendations accompanying evidence summaries in the context of low or very low certainty of evidence (Trial registration NCT02006017).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-40
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume99
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2018

Keywords

  • Clinical practice guidelines
  • Clinicians’ preferences
  • Evidence synthesis
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • GRADE
  • Knowledge translation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do clinicians want recommendations? A multicenter study comparing evidence summaries with and without GRADE recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this