Abstract
Autobiographical memory is central to identity and self-awareness, but individuals with depression and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder tend to have overgeneral memories. Recent research has suggested that the ability to retrieve specific memories and individual differences in the amount of detail in specific memories are independent (Kyung, Yanes-Lukin, & Roberts, 2016). We re-analyzed data from Kyung et al. to test whether these constructs are distinct in terms of their trajectories over cue presentations. Results indicated a U-shaped trajectory for specificity, but a inverted-U trajectory for detail, suggesting a dissociation in which periods of decreasing probability of retrieving specific memories correspond to increasing amounts of detail. Further, trajectories had similar forms when memories included emotional content, but differed for recollections that did not include emotional content. Finally, at the individual level, slopes for specificity and detail across trials were uncorrelated. These findings provide further support for the independence of these constructs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 342-351 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Consciousness and Cognition |
| Volume | 65 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2018 |
Keywords
- Autobiographical memory
- Emotion
- Memory detail
- Memory specificity
- Overgeneral memory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Distinctions between autobiographical memory specificity and detail: Trajectories across cue presentations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver