Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures: An Epidemiological Analysis Using a Large Population Database

  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

225 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The incidence of distal biceps tendon ruptures was studied more than 10 years ago in a small patient cohort. Recent diagnostic advancements have improved the ability to detect this rare injury. Hypothesis: The incidence of distal biceps tendon ruptures will be significantly greater than previously reported. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiologic study. Methods: A query of the PearlDiver Technologies national database containing public and private insurance patients was used to estimate the national incidence of distal biceps tendon ruptures in the United States. A retrospective chart review of our local population identified demographic groups and risk factors that increased likelihood of injury. Results: The estimated national incidence of distal biceps tendon rupture was 2.55 per 100,000 patient-years. The local incidence was 5.35 per 100,000 patient-years. The mean and median ages of patients in our regional cohort were 46.3 and 46 years, respectively. Males composed the majority of the injured population (national 95%, regional 96%). Smoking and elevated body mass index were found to be associated with increased likelihood of injury, while diabetes mellitus showed no association. Conclusion: The incidence of distal biceps tendon ruptures in this study was higher than previously reported.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2012-2017
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume43
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 4 2015

Keywords

  • distal biceps tendon
  • elbow
  • epidemiology
  • upper extremity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures: An Epidemiological Analysis Using a Large Population Database'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this