Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dissociation between superoxide accumulation and nitroglycerin-induced tolerance

  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

We hypothesize that superoxide (O2.-) accumulation is not a crucial causative factor in inducing nitroglycerin (NTG) tolerance. In LLC-PK1 cells, pre-exposure to NTG resulted in increased O2 .- accumulation and reduced cGMP response to NTG versus vehicle control. O2.- stimulated by NTG was reduced by oxypurinol (100 μM), a xanthine oxidase inhibitor. Exposure to angiotensin II (Ang II) increased O2.- but did not reduce cGMP response. The O2.- scavenger tiron reduced Ang II-induced O 2.- production but did not increase NTG-stimulated cGMP production. Using p47phox-/- and gp91phox-/- mice versus their respective wild-type controls (WT), we showed that aorta from mice null of these critical NADPH oxidase subunits exhibited similar vascular tolerance after NTG dosing (20 mg/kg s.c., t.i.d. for 3 days), as indicated by their ex vivo pEC50 and cGMP accumulation upon NTG challenge. In vitro aorta O 2.- production was enhanced by NTG incubation in both p47phox null and WT mice. Pre-exposure of isolated mice aorta to 100 μM NTG for 1 h resulted in vascular tolerance toward NTG and increased O 2.- accumulation. Oxypurinol (1 mM) reduced O 2.- but did not attenuate vascular tolerance. These results suggest that O2.- does not initiate either in vitro and in vivo NTG tolerance, and that the p47phox and gp91 phox subunits of NADPH oxidase are not critically required. Increased O2.- accumulation may be an effect, rather than an initiating cause, of NTG tolerance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-104
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Volume327
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dissociation between superoxide accumulation and nitroglycerin-induced tolerance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this