Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dissociating uncertainty responses and reinforcement signals in the comparative study of uncertainty monitoring

  • J. David Smith
  • , Joshua S. Redford
  • , Michael J. Beran
  • , David A. Washburn
  • SUNY Buffalo
  • Georgia State University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

108 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although researchers are exploring animals' capacity for monitoring their states of uncertainty, the use of some paradigms allows the criticism that animals map avoidance responses to error-causing stimuli not because of uncertainty monitored but because of feedback signals and stimulus aversion. The authors addressed this criticism with an uncertainty-monitoring task in which participants completed blocks of trials with feedback deferred so that they could not associate reinforcement signals to particular stimuli or stimulus-response pairs. Humans and 1 of 2 monkeys were able to make cognitive, decisional uncertainty responses that were independent of feedback or reinforcement history within a task. This finding unifies the comparative literature on uncertainty monitoring. The dissociation of performance from reinforcement has theoretical implications, and the deferred-feedback technique has many applications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)282-297
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume135
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006

Keywords

  • Deferred feedback
  • Macaca mulatta
  • Metacognition
  • Monkeys
  • Uncertainty monitoring

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dissociating uncertainty responses and reinforcement signals in the comparative study of uncertainty monitoring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this