Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Discussion of "biomedical informatics: We are what we publish"

  • A. Geissbuhler
  • , W. E. Hammond
  • , A. Hasman
  • , R. Hussein
  • , R. Koppel
  • , C. A. Kulikowski
  • , V. Maojo
  • , F. Martin-Sanchez
  • , P. W. Moorman
  • , L. A. Moura
  • , F. G.B. De Quirós
  • , M. J. Schuemie
  • , B. Smith
  • , J. Talmon
  • University of Geneva
  • Duke University
  • Amsterdam University Medical Center
  • Ministry of Communication and Information Technology
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
  • Technical University of Madrid
  • University of Melbourne
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Assis Moura eHealth
  • Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Maastricht University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article is part of a For-Discussion-Sec-tion of Methods of Information in Medicine about the paper Biomedical Informatics: We Are What We Publish, written by Peter L. Elkin, Steven H. Brown, and Graham Wright. It is introduced by an editorial. This article contains the combined commenta -ries invited to independently comment on the Elkin et al. paper. In subsequent issues the discussion can continue through letters to the editor.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)547-562
Number of pages16
JournalMethods of Information in Medicine
Volume52
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Keywords

  • Biomedical informatics
  • Medline
  • Natural language processing
  • Ontology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Discussion of "biomedical informatics: We are what we publish"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this