Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Mismatch on Portable, Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Among Acute Stroke Patients

  • Annabel Sorby-Adams
  • , Jennifer Guo
  • , Adam de Havenon
  • , Seyedmehdi Payabvash
  • , Gordon Sze
  • , Nandor K. Pinter
  • , Vinay Jaikumar
  • , Adnan Siddiqui
  • , Steven Baldassano
  • , Ana Lucia Garcia-Guarniz
  • , Julia Zabinska
  • , Dheeraj Lalwani
  • , Emma Peasley
  • , Joshua N. Goldstein
  • , Olivia K. Nelson
  • , Pamela W. Schaefer
  • , Charles R. Wira
  • , John Pitts
  • , Vivien Lee
  • , Keith W. Muir
  • Shahid M. Nimjee, John Kirsch, Juan Eugenio Iglesias, Matthew S. Rosen, Kevin N. Sheth, W. Taylor Kimberly
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Yale University
  • SUNY Buffalo
  • Yale New Haven Health System
  • Hyperfine Incorporated
  • Ohio State University
  • University of Glasgow
  • University College London
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: For stroke patients with unknown time of onset, mismatch between diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can guide thrombolytic intervention. However, access to MRI for hyperacute stroke is limited. Here, we sought to evaluate whether a portable, low-field (LF)-MRI scanner can identify DWI-FLAIR mismatch in acute ischemic stroke. Methods: Eligible patients with a diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke underwent LF-MRI acquisition on a 0.064-T scanner within 24 h of last known well. Qualitative and quantitative metrics were evaluated. Two trained assessors determined the visibility of stroke lesions on LF-FLAIR. An image coregistration pipeline was developed, and the LF-FLAIR signal intensity ratio (SIR) was derived. Results: The study included 71 patients aged 71 ± 14 years and a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale of 6 (interquartile range 3–14). The interobserver agreement for identifying visible FLAIR hyperintensities was high (κ = 0.85, 95% CI 0.70–0.99). Visual DWI-FLAIR mismatch had a 60% sensitivity and 82% specificity for stroke patients <4.5 h, with a negative predictive value of 93%. LF-FLAIR SIR had a mean value of 1.18 ± 0.18 <4.5 h, 1.24 ± 0.39 4.5–6 h, and 1.40 ± 0.23 >6 h of stroke onset. The optimal cut-point for LF-FLAIR SIR was 1.15, with 85% sensitivity and 70% specificity. A cut-point of 6.6 h was established for a FLAIR SIR <1.15, with an 89% sensitivity and 62% specificity. Interpretation: A 0.064-T portable LF-MRI can identify DWI-FLAIR mismatch among patients with acute ischemic stroke. Future research is needed to prospectively validate thresholds and evaluate a role of LF-MRI in guiding thrombolysis among stroke patients with uncertain time of onset. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:321–331.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-331
Number of pages11
JournalAnnals of Neurology
Volume96
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Mismatch on Portable, Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Among Acute Stroke Patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this