Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Differences between fluid-phase endocytosis (pinocytosis) and receptor-mediated endocytosis in isolated rat hepatocytes

  • University of Oslo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations

Abstract

To characterize possible differences between the fluid-phase endocytosis (pinocytosis) of bovine serum albumin and the receptor-mediated endocytosis of asialo-orosomucoid (AOM) in isolated rat hepatocytes, both probes were conjugated to radioiodinated tyramine-cellobiose, [125I]TC. The use of these conjugates made it possible to measure the uptake and intracellular distribution of the intact proteins as well as of their acid-soluble, membrane-impermeant degradation products. [125I]TC-albumin was taken up at a very low rate (0.5%/h) compared to [125I]TC-AOM (45%/h), suggesting that neither membrane adsorption nor membrane permeation compromised its suitability as a fluid-phase marker. Sucrose gradient analysis indicated that both probes sequentially entered light endosomes (1.11 g/ml), dense endosomes (1.14 g/ml) and lysosomes (1.18 g/ml), but [125I]TC-albumin traversed the endocytic compartments more rapidly than [125I]TC-AOM, and was partially degraded intralysosomally already after 15 min. The microtubule inhibitor, vinblastine, had a stronger inhibitory effect on the uptake and degradation of [125I]TC-AOM (80% and 95%, respectively) than on the uptake and degradation of [125I]TC-albumin (50% and 70%, respectively). In the presence of vinblastine, [125I]TC-AOM was retained both in light and dense endosomes, whereas [125I]TC-albumin was retained in dense endosomes only, suggesting that the early steps of fluid-phase endocytosis were less critically dependent on microtubular function than the early steps of receptor-mediated endocytosis. A perturbant of vacuolar pH, propylamine, inhibited the degradation of both probes strongly (75-100%), as would he expected from its lysosomotropic effect. Propylamine also inhibited endocytic uptake, with a stronger effect on [125I]TC-AOM uptake (95% inhibition) than on [125I]TC-albumin uptake (60% inhibition), probably reflecting a reduction in endosomal acidity reduced receptor-ligand dissociation and diminished recycling of free asialoglycoprotein receptors to the cell surface in addition to a general trapping of membrane in swollen vacuoles. A protein phosphatase inhibitor, okadaic acid, strongly (80-100%) inhibited the uptake and degradation of both [125I]TC-albumin and [125I]TC-AOM. An inhibitor of lysosomal proteinases, leupeptin, strongly suppressed the degradation of both probes and moderately reduced the uptake of [125I]TC-AOM, whereas the uptake of [125I]TC-albumin was unaffected. In contrast, an inhibitor of autophagic sequestration, 3-methyladenine, reduced both the uptake and degradation of [125I]TC-albumin markedly (55% and 75%, respectively), with considerably less effect on [125I]TC-AOM (25% and 35%, respectively). An autophagy-inhibitory amino acid mixture did not share these effects, suggesting that 3-methyladenine may suppress endocytic fluid-phase uptake by an autophagy-independent mechanism. Fluid-phase and receptor-mediated endocytosis in hepatocytes thus appear to differ with respect to uptake mechanisms as well as in the kinetics by which endocytosed material traverses the endocytic lysosomal pathway.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)28-39
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Journal of Cell Biology
Volume73
Issue number1
StatePublished - May 1997

Keywords

  • 3-Methyladenine
  • Amino acid
  • Autophagosome
  • Autophagy
  • Density gradient
  • Leupeptin
  • Liver
  • Lysosome
  • Okadaic acid
  • Propylamine
  • Subcellular fractionation
  • Vinblastine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differences between fluid-phase endocytosis (pinocytosis) and receptor-mediated endocytosis in isolated rat hepatocytes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this