TY - GEN
T1 - Dichotomy of design experience
T2 - ASME 2020 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC-CIE 2020
AU - Olewnik, Andrew
AU - Yerrick, Randy
AU - Simmons, Amanda
AU - Lee, Yonghee
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020 ASME.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - This paper presents a case study of Jeff, a mechanical engineering senior, and his experience with design in two different contexts-one in the classroom and one extracurricular. After a year-long study of undergraduate engineers, Jeff revealed marked differences in his uptake of design principles and reflexivity toward his thinking within the discipline. We explored with Jeff the critical differences and experiences that led to his changes once we had completed data collection with his peer cohort of undergraduates. We explored Jeff's interpretation of the differences he considered as positive changes, the attributes of applying principles of problem typology, and the requisite context required to achieve these changes as a student. Through qualitative analysis four assertions are examined-improved approach to design problem solving, broadened view of design, engineering as multiple types of problems, and relevance to the profession- A nd validated through a member check. Potential implications for engineering education, especially as it pertains to design education are briefly described.
AB - This paper presents a case study of Jeff, a mechanical engineering senior, and his experience with design in two different contexts-one in the classroom and one extracurricular. After a year-long study of undergraduate engineers, Jeff revealed marked differences in his uptake of design principles and reflexivity toward his thinking within the discipline. We explored with Jeff the critical differences and experiences that led to his changes once we had completed data collection with his peer cohort of undergraduates. We explored Jeff's interpretation of the differences he considered as positive changes, the attributes of applying principles of problem typology, and the requisite context required to achieve these changes as a student. Through qualitative analysis four assertions are examined-improved approach to design problem solving, broadened view of design, engineering as multiple types of problems, and relevance to the profession- A nd validated through a member check. Potential implications for engineering education, especially as it pertains to design education are briefly described.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85096186532
U2 - 10.1115/DETC2020-22667
DO - 10.1115/DETC2020-22667
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85096186532
T3 - Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
BT - 17th International Conference on Design Education (DEC)
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Y2 - 17 August 2020 through 19 August 2020
ER -