Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Diagnostic decisions in child language assessment: Findings from a case review assessment task

  • Buffalo State College, State University of New York
  • University of Houston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: The current study used a case review diagnostic assessment task to examine the diagnostic decisions speech-language pathologists (SLPs) working in the United States made after reviewing child language cases. Method: Fourteen SLPs were given 5 case studies that presented either congruent or incongruent results between standardized testing and informal measures. After reviewing the assessment data, SLPs were asked to make a diagnostic decision. Results: Unanimous consensus regarding diagnostic decisions was found when the assessment data were congruent. When the data were incongruent, unanimous consensus was not achieved. Standardized testing seemed to guide the diagnostic decision. This pattern of reliance on standardized testing was evident even when 80% of SLPs reviewed informal language data. In 97% of cases, a standardized test was used to guide clinical decision making. Conclusion: Three patterns of clinical decision making in child language assessment emerged: (a) use of both standardized testing and informal measures, (b) a reported concern tool as a 1st step in the process, and (c) standardized testing as the most influential data for guiding diagnostic decisions. Although this study provides initial evidence regarding the process of diagnostic decision making, future studies should examine decision making in real time to further validate the implicit rules used during decision making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)385-398
Number of pages14
JournalLanguage, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
Volume50
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic decisions in child language assessment: Findings from a case review assessment task'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this