Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Devices for the diagnosis and treatment of temporomandibular disorders. Part II: Electromyography and sonography

  • Norman D. Mohl
  • , James P. Lund
  • , Charles G. Widmer
  • , W. D. McCall
  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

88 Scopus citations

Abstract

This second article in the three-part series on temporomandibular disorder (TMD) devices compares the claimed diagnostic usefulness of electromyography and sonography with the present scientific evidence. This review concludes that there is no evidence to support the use of either surface electromyography or silent period duration for the evaluation or diagnosis of TMD. Furthermore, in view of the available evidence, sonography and Doppler ultrasound have no particular advantage over a conventional stethoscope or direct auscultation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)332-336
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume63
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1990

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Devices for the diagnosis and treatment of temporomandibular disorders. Part II: Electromyography and sonography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this