Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Development, validation and clinical application of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Assessment and Completion Evaluation: intraoperative assessment of lymph node dissection after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer

  • Ahmed A. Hussein
  • , Nobuyuki Hinata
  • , Shiva Dibaj
  • , Paul R. May
  • , Justen D. Kozlowski
  • , Hassan Abol-Enein
  • , Ronney Abaza
  • , Daniel Eun
  • , Mohamed S. Khan
  • , James L. Mohler
  • , Piyush Agarwal
  • , Kamal Pohar
  • , Richard Sarle
  • , Ronald Boris
  • , Sridhar S. Mane
  • , Alan Hutson
  • , Khurshid A. Guru
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  • Cairo University
  • Kobe University
  • Mansoura University
  • Riverside Methodist Hospital
  • Temple University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Ohio State University
  • Michigan Institute of Urology
  • Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a scoring tool, Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Appropriateness and Completion Evaluation (PLACE), to assess the intraoperative completeness and appropriateness of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) following robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). Patients, Subjects and Methods: A panel of 11 open and robotic surgeons developed the content and structure of PLACE. The PLND template was divided into three zones. In all, 21 de-identified videos of bilateral robot-assisted PLNDs were assessed by the 11 experts using PLACE to determine inter-rater reliability. Lymph node (LN) clearance was defined as the proportion of cleared LNs from all PLACE zones. We investigated the correlation between LN clearance and LN count. Then, we compared the LN count of 18 prospective PLNDs using PLACE with our retrospective series performed using the extended template (No PLACE). Results: A significant reliability was achieved for all PLACE zones among the 11 raters for the 21 bilateral PLND videos. The median (interquartile range) for LN clearance was 468 (431–545). There was a significant positive correlation between LN clearance and LN count (R2 = 0.70, P < 0.01). The PLACE group yielded similar LN counts when compared to the No PLACE group. Conclusions: Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Appropriateness and Completion Evaluation is a structured intraoperative scoring system that can be used intraoperatively to measure and quantify PLND for quality control and to facilitate training during RARC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)879-884
Number of pages6
JournalBJU International
Volume119
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2017

Keywords

  • #BladderCancer
  • #blcsm
  • lymph node dissection
  • lymphadenectomy
  • quality
  • radical cystectomy
  • robot-assisted

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development, validation and clinical application of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Assessment and Completion Evaluation: intraoperative assessment of lymph node dissection after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this