Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Developing Evidence to Decision Frameworks and an Interactive Evidence to Decision Tool for Making and Using Decisions and Recommendations in Health Care

  • Sarah E. Rosenbaum
  • , Jenny Moberg
  • , Claire Glenton
  • , Holger J. Schünemann
  • , Simon Lewin
  • , Elie Akl
  • , Reem A. Mustafa
  • , Angela Morelli
  • , Joshua P. Vogel
  • , Pablo Alonso-Coello
  • , Gabriel Rada
  • , Juan Vásquez
  • , Elena Parmelli
  • , A. Metin Gülmezoglu
  • , Signe A. Flottorp
  • , Andrew D. Oxman
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health
  • South African Medical Research Council
  • American University of Beirut
  • University of Kansas
  • InfoDesignLab - Sentralen
  • World Health Organization
  • Research Institute of the Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
  • Epistemonikos Foundation
  • Department of Epidemiology of the Lazio Region – ASL Roma 1
  • University of Oslo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Evidence-informed health care decisions and recommendations need to be made systematically and transparently. Mediating technology can help manage boundaries between groups making decisions and target audiences, enhancing salience, credibility, and legitimacy for all. This article describes the development of the Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework and an interactive tool to create and use frameworks (iEtD) to support communication in decision making. Methods: Using a human-centered design approach, we created prototypes employing a broad range of methods to iteratively develop EtD framework content and iEtD tool functionality. Results: We developed tailored EtD frameworks for making evidence-informed decisions and recommendations about clinical practice interventions, diagnostic and screening tests, coverage, and health system and public health options. The iEtD tool provides functionality for preparing frameworks, using them in group discussions, and publishing output for implementation or adaption. EtD and iEtD are intuitive and useful for producers and users of frameworks, and flexible for use across different types of topics, decisions, and organizations. They bring valued structure to panel discussions and transparency to published output. Conclusion: EtD and iEtD can resolve some of the challenges inherent in multicriteria, multistakeholder decision systems. They are freely available online for all to use at https://ietd.epistemonikos.org/ and https://gradepro.org.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1700081
JournalGlobal Challenges
Volume2
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2018

Keywords

  • communication
  • decision making
  • guidelines
  • human-centered design
  • recommendations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Developing Evidence to Decision Frameworks and an Interactive Evidence to Decision Tool for Making and Using Decisions and Recommendations in Health Care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this