Abstract
The emphasis of this paper is to design a Performance Evaluation Methodology for Data Fusion-based Multiple Target Tracking Systems. Within this methodology the Performance Evaluation process is treated as a whole new fusion process. This has two major advantages - (1) Facilitates reusability of existing models and algorithms, and (2) Using standard frameworks and norms makes it easier for the tracking community to easily adopt it - thus giving this aspect of tracking a highly needed jumpstart. A case study implementation of this design methodology is presented. Three different Track-Truth Association strategies were implemented to study the effect of Track-Truth Association strategies on the performance metrics. The case study results conclusively show that the selection of the Track-Truth Association strategy should be done with reference to the scenario characteristics, the "mission" goals and the performance metrics to be evaluated.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 139-151 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering |
| Volume | 5099 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2003 |
| Event | Multisensor. Multisource Information Fusion: Architectures, Algorithms, and Applications 2003 - Orlando, FL, United States Duration: Apr 23 2003 → Apr 25 2003 |
Keywords
- Data fusion
- Performance evaluation
- Target tracking
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Design of a performance evaluation methodology for data fusion-based multiple target tracking systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver