Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

DBATES: Dataset for Discerning Benefits of Audio, Textual, and Facial Expression Features in Competitive Debate Speeches

  • Taylan K. Sen
  • , Gazi Naven
  • , Luke Gerstner
  • , Daryl Bagley
  • , Raiyan Abdul Baten
  • , Wasifur Rahman
  • , Md Kamrul Hasan
  • , Kurtis Haut
  • , Abdullah Al Mamun
  • , Samiha Samrose
  • , Anne Solbu
  • , R. Eric Barnes
  • , Mark G. Frank
  • , Ehsan Hoque
    • University of Rochester
    • SUNY Buffalo
    • Hobart and William Smith Colleges

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    In this article, we present a database of multimodal communication features extracted from debate speeches in the 2019 North American Universities Debate Championships (NAUDC). Feature sets were extracted from the visual (facial expression, gaze, and head pose), audio (PRAAT), and textual (word sentiment and linguistic category) modalities of raw video recordings of competitive collegiate debaters (N=716 6-minute recordings from 140 unique debaters). Each speech has an associated competition debate score (range: 67-96) from experienced judges as well as competitor demographic and per-round reflection surveys. We observe the fully multimodal model performs best in comparison to models trained on various compositions of individual modalities. We also find that the weights of some features (such as the expression of joy and the use of the word 'we') change in direction between the aforementioned models. We use these results to highlight the value of a multimodal dataset for studying competitive, collegiate debate.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1028-1043
    Number of pages16
    JournalIEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
    Volume14
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Apr 1 2023

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'DBATES: Dataset for Discerning Benefits of Audio, Textual, and Facial Expression Features in Competitive Debate Speeches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this