Abstract
AbstractCompared to US stocks, Chinese stocks earn most of the returns during the day. We argue this reflects a shifted illiquidity premium caused by the day trading ban in 1995. We estimate difference-in-differences regressions comparing affected Chinese A-shares to unaffected Chinese B-shares and propensity-score matched Japanese stocks around that ban. We find an increase in day returns (especially, for previously liquid stocks), a decrease in night returns, and unchanged 24-hour returns. Using data from 1993 to 2014, we exclude a risk-based explanation and provide evidence indicating that the time-series illiquidity premium shifts from night to day, while the cross-sectional illiquidity premium diminishes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 103100 |
| Journal | Pacific Basin Finance Journal |
| Volume | 97 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2026 |
Keywords
- Chinese stocks
- Day trading
- Day–night
- Illiquidity premium
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Day trading and illiquidity premia: Evidence from China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver