Abstract
We respond to a call to analyze issues of curriculum standards and to present alternative storylines by addressing criticisms of the Common Core State Standards in early childhood. We describe a storyline from multiple media and evaluate this storyline's criticisms, focusing on the criticism that the standards are developmentally inappropriate. We review research and conclude that the criticism is invalid and may reflect a historical belief in the primacy of development over learning rather than the research record. Misinterpreting or ignoring relevant research has equity consequences because it may particularly harm those children most in need of learning support in learning grade-level mathematics. Fortunately, theory and research illuminate learning trajectories that help all children meet these standards.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 11-22 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Journal for Research in Mathematics Education |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2019 |
Keywords
- At-risk students
- Classroom research
- Common Core
- Early childhood
- Learning trajectories
- Mathematics
- Primary
- Standards
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Critiques of the common core in early math: A research-based response'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver