Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Covariance analysis of maximum likelihood attitude estimation

  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

An attitude determination covariance measurement model for unit vector sensors with a wide field-of-view is analyzed and compared to the classic QUEST covariance model. The wide field-of-view model has been previously proposed as a more realistic alternative for sensors where measurement accuracy depends on angular distance from the boresight axis. Both QUEST and the wide field-of-view models are evaluated relative to a measurement model that uses the two-dimensional sensor focal plane measurements directly, rather than first converting them to unit vectors. The Cramér-Rao lower bound is derived for attitude determination based on such direct sensor measurements, and the wide field-of-view measurement model is shown to achieve this Cramér-Rao lower bound. Numerical simulations confirm that an extended Kalman filter based on the wide field-of-view model outperforms a filter based on the QUEST measurement model, and also that the wide field-of-view 3σ bounds are effectively identical to those of a filter based on the direct two-dimensional sensor measurements.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference
PublisherAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.
ISBN (Print)9781624102240
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013
EventAIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference - Boston, MA, United States
Duration: Aug 19 2013Aug 22 2013

Publication series

NameAIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference

Conference

ConferenceAIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityBoston, MA
Period08/19/1308/22/13

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Covariance analysis of maximum likelihood attitude estimation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this