Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cost effectiveness of recruitment methods in an obesity prevention trial for young children

  • Jodie L. Robinson
  • , Janene H. Fuerch
  • , Dana D. Winiewicz
  • , Sarah J. Salvy
  • , James N. Roemmich
  • , Leonard H. Epstein
  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background.: Recruitment of participants for clinical trials requires considerable effort and cost. There is no research on the cost effectiveness of recruitment methods for an obesity prevention trial of young children. Methods.: This study determined the cost effectiveness of recruiting 70 families with a child aged 4 to 7 (5.9 ± 1.3) years in Western New York from February 2003 to November 2004, for a 2-year randomized obesity prevention trial to reduce television watching in the home. Results.: Of the 70 randomized families, 65.7% (n = 46) were obtained through direct mailings, 24.3% (n = 17) were acquired through newspaper advertisements, 7.1% (n = 5) from other sources (e.g., word of mouth), and 2.9% (n = 2) through posters and brochures. Costs of each recruitment method were computed by adding the cost of materials, staff time, and media expenses. Cost effectiveness (money spent per randomized participant) was US $0 for other sources, US $227.76 for direct mailing, US $546.95 for newspaper ads, and US $3020.84 for posters and brochures. Conclusion.: Of the methods with associated costs, direct mailing was the most cost effective in recruiting families with young children, which supports the growing literature of the effectiveness of direct mailing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)499-503
Number of pages5
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume44
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2007

Keywords

  • Advertising
  • Child
  • Cost analysis
  • Direct Mail
  • Prevention trials
  • Recruitment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost effectiveness of recruitment methods in an obesity prevention trial for young children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this