Abstract
In the original version of this article, in the conclusion section of the abstract, the word “inversely” was missing between “was” and “associated”. Conclusion section in the abstract, which previously read Our study suggested that higher magnesium intake was associated with the development of cognitive impairment in men in a median follow-up period of 6 years. Should have read Our study suggested that higher magnesium intake was inversely associated with the development of cognitive impairment in men in a median follow-up period of 6 years. In discussion section, in the first sentence of the last paragraph, “higher odds” should be “lower odds” In discussion section, the first sentence of the last paragraph, which previously read In summary, our study confirmed that higher magnesium intake was associated with higher odds of a poor performance on the MMSE and DSST in men in a median follow-up period of 6 years. Should have read In summary, our study confirmed that higher magnesium intake was associated with lower odds of a poor performance on the MMSE and DSST in men in a median follow-up period of 6 years.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 72 |
| Journal | European Journal of Nutrition |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Mar 2025 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of magnesium intake and cognition in the Healthy Aging Longitudinal Study in Taiwan (European Journal of Nutrition, (2024), 63, 8, (3061-3073), 10.1007/s00394-024-03490-z)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver