Continuity corrected approximations for and 'exact' inference with Pearson's X²

The classical adjustments for the inadequacy of the asymptotic distribution of Pearson's X² statistic, when some cells are sparse or the cell expectations are small, use continuity corrections and exact moments; the recent approach is to use computer based 'exact inference'. In this paper we observe that the original exact test due to Freeman and Halton (Biometrika 38 (1951), 141-149) and its computer implementation are theoretically unsound. Furthermore, the corrected algorithmic version for the exact p-value in StatXact is practically useful in very few cases, and the results of its present version which includes Monte Carlo estimates can be highly variable. We then derive asymptotic expansions for the moments of the null distribution of Pearson's X², introduce a new method of correcting for discreteness and finite range of Pearson's X² as an alternative to the classical continuity correction, and use them to construct new and improved approximations for the null distribution. We also offer diagnostic criteria applicable to the tables for selecting an appropriate approximation. The exact methods and the competing approximations are studied and compared using thirteen test cases from the literature. It is concluded that the accuracy of the appropriate approximation is comparable with the truly exact method whenever it is available. The use of approximations is therefore preferable if the truly exact computer intensive solutions are unavailable or infeasible.