Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Consumer perspectives on assistive technology outcomes

  • Georgia Institute of Technology
  • University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

137 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: The current study explored domains of assistive technology (AT) device outcomes that are most valued by AT users. A secondary objective was to identify elements in the device acquisition process that affect outcomes. Method: Focus groups were conducted at geographically dispersed locations within the USA. The groups were moderated by experienced AT practitioners who followed a detailed procedure emphasizing a nominal group facilitation technique. Results: Twenty-four adult AT users, representing a range of ages and disability populations, participated in four focus groups. Many had over 15 years of experience with multiple device types. Qualitative analysis yielded 13 threads that embodied salient outcome domains (e.g. independence, subjective well-being, participation in work and school, cost-effectiveness) and key factors associated with the device acquisition process (e.g. lengthy periods of frustration, variable quality of service providers). Ironically, these data were evoked only after the term ''outcomes'' was omitted from focus group questions. Conclusions: AT outcomes studies are needed that report data regarding (a) the impact of AT on participation, (b) costs of AT provision and (c) key elements in the AT service delivery process. Future studies will be further strengthened to the extent that their methodologies actively assimilate consumer perspectives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)373-380
Number of pages8
JournalDisability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
Volume8
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Keywords

  • Assistive technology
  • Focus groups
  • Outcomes measurement
  • Participation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Consumer perspectives on assistive technology outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this