Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Constant approximation for capacitated k-median with (1+ϵ)-capacity violation

  • The University of Chicago

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

We study the Capacitated k-Median problem for which existing constant-factor approximation algorithms are all pseudo-approximations that violate either the capacities or the upper bound k on the number of open facilities. Using the natural LP relaxation for the problem, one can only hope to get the violation factor down to 2. Li [SODA'16] introduced a novel LP to go beyond the limit of 2 and gave a constant-factor approximation algorithm that opens (1 + ϵ)k facilities. We use the configuration LP of Li [SODA'16] to give a constant-factor approximation for the Capacitated k-Median problem in a seemingly harder configuration: we violate only the capacities by 1 + ϵ. This result settles the problem as far as pseudo-approximation algorithms are concerned.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, ICALP 2016
EditorsYuval Rabani, Ioannis Chatzigiannakis, Davide Sangiorgi, Michael Mitzenmacher
PublisherSchloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing
ISBN (Electronic)9783959770132
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016
Event43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, ICALP 2016 - Rome, Italy
Duration: Jul 12 2016Jul 15 2016

Publication series

NameLeibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs
Volume55
ISSN (Print)1868-8969

Conference

Conference43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, ICALP 2016
Country/TerritoryItaly
CityRome
Period07/12/1607/15/16

Keywords

  • Approximation algorithms
  • Capacitated k-median
  • Capacity violation
  • Pseudo approximation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Constant approximation for capacitated k-median with (1+ϵ)-capacity violation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this