Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Considering health equity when moving from evidence-based guideline recommendations to implementation: A case study from an upper-middle income country on the GRADE approach

  • Javier Eslava-Schmalbach
  • , Paola Mosquera
  • , Juan Pablo Alzate
  • , Kevin Pottie
  • , Vivian Welch
  • , Elie A. Akl
  • , Janet Jull
  • , Eddy Lang
  • , Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi
  • , Rachel Morton
  • , Lehana Thabane
  • , Bev Shea
  • , Airton T. Stein
  • , Jasvinder Singh
  • , Ivan D. Florez
  • , Gordon Guyatt
  • , Holger Schünemann
  • , Peter Tugwell
  • Universidad Nacional de Colombia
  • Colombian Society of Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation (S.C.A.R.E.)
  • Umeå University
  • University of Ottawa
  • McMaster University
  • American University of Beirut
  • Foothills Medical Center
  • University of Glasgow
  • The University of Sydney
  • Universidade Luterana do Brasil
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • Universidad de Antioquia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

The availability of evidence-based guidelines does not ensure their implementation and use in clinical practice or policy making. Inequities in health have been defined as those inequalities within or between populations that are avoidable, unnecessary and also unjust and unfair. Evidence-based clinical practice and public health guidelines ('guidelines') can be used to target health inequities experienced by disadvantaged populations, although guidelines may unintentionally increase health inequities. For this reason, there is a need for evidence-based clinical practice and public health guidelines to intentionally target health inequities experienced by disadvantaged populations. Current guideline development processes do not include steps for planned implementation of equity-focused guidelines. This article describes nine steps that provide guidance for consideration of equity during guideline implementation. A critical appraisal of the literature followed by a process to build expert consensus was undertaken to define how to include consideration of equity issues during the specific GRADE guideline development process. Using a case study from Colombia we describe nine steps that were used to implement equity-focused GRADE recommendations: (1) identification of disadvantaged groups, (2) quantification of current health inequities, (3) development of equity-sensitive recommendations, (4) identification of key actors for implementation of equity-focused recommendations, (5) identification of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of equity-focused recommendations, (6) development of an equity strategy to be included in the implementation plan, (7) assessment of resources and incentives, (8) development of a communication strategy to support an equity focus and (9) development of monitoring and evaluation strategies. This case study can be used as model for implementing clinical practice guidelines, taking into account equity issues during guideline development and implementation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1484-1490
Number of pages7
JournalHealth Policy and Planning
Volume32
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Keywords

  • Health inequalities
  • clinical
  • equity
  • implementation
  • practice guidelines

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Considering health equity when moving from evidence-based guideline recommendations to implementation: A case study from an upper-middle income country on the GRADE approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this