Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Conflict, justice, and inequality: Why perceptions of leader–member exchange differentiation hurt performance in teams

  • University of Melbourne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Scopus citations

Abstract

To better understand why leader–member exchange (LMX) differentiation in teams may be detrimental to individual and team performance, we propose that team members' perception of LMX differentiation (PLMXD) is more important than statistical measures of LMX differentiation. Specifically, we hypothesize a multilevel model in which relationship conflict and procedural justice (climate) mediate the relationships of individual and collective PLMXDs with individual and team performance, respectively. Using a sample of 235 individuals in 53 teams, we found that individual PLMXD was negatively related to individual performance through relationship conflict perceptions, controlling for LMX. At the team level, collective PLMXD was negatively related to team performance through procedural justice climate and relationship conflict, controlling for a statistical measure of LMXD. Theoretical implications and directions for future research are explored.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)567-586
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Organizational Behavior
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2020

Keywords

  • conflict
  • differentiation
  • justice
  • leader–member exchange
  • multilevel model

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conflict, justice, and inequality: Why perceptions of leader–member exchange differentiation hurt performance in teams'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this