Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Conceptualizing a probabilistic risk and loss assessment framework for wildfires

  • Negar Elhami-Khorasani
  • , Hamed Ebrahimian
  • , Lawrence Buja
  • , Susan L. Cutter
  • , Branko Kosovic
  • , Neil Lareau
  • , Brian J. Meacham
  • , Eric Rowell
  • , Ertugrul Taciroglu
  • , Matthew P. Thompson
  • , Adam C. Watts
  • University of Nevada, Reno
  • University of South Carolina
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
  • Meacham Associates
  • Desert Research Institute
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • United States Department of Agriculture

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Wildfires are an essential part of a healthy ecosystem, yet the expansion of the wildland-urban interface, combined with climatic changes and other anthropogenic activities, have led to the rise of wildfire hazards in the past few decades. Managing future wildfires and their multi-dimensional impacts requires moving from traditional reactive response to deploying proactive policies, strategies, and interventional programs to reduce wildfire risk to wildland-urban interface communities. Existing risk assessment frameworks lack a unified analytical method that properly captures uncertainties and the impact of decisions across social, ecological, and technical systems, hindering effective decision-making related to risk reduction investments. In this paper, a conceptual probabilistic wildfire risk assessment framework that propagates modeling uncertainties is presented. The framework characterizes the dynamic risk through spatial probability density functions of loss, where loss can include different decision variables, such as physical, social, economic, environmental, and health impacts, depending on the stakeholder needs and jurisdiction. The proposed approach consists of a computational framework to propagate and integrate uncertainties in the fire scenarios, propagation of fire in the wildland and urban areas, damage, and loss analyses. Elements of this framework that require further research are identified, and the complexity in characterizing wildfire losses and the need for an analytical-deliberative process to include the perspectives of the spectrum of stakeholders are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1153-1169
Number of pages17
JournalNatural Hazards
Volume114
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2022

Keywords

  • Damage
  • Loss
  • Performance-based approach
  • Spatial probability density function
  • Wildfire

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conceptualizing a probabilistic risk and loss assessment framework for wildfires'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this