Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Complementary evaluation of diagonal tension field inclination angle in steel plate shear walls

  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

Abstract

Complementarily to previous studies, research was conducted to investigate whether the equivalent constant angle of diagonal tension field action should be taken as either 40° or 45° for ductile steel plate shear walls (SPSW) designed per current codes. A two-dimensional finite element (FE) model was first calibrated against results from a prior study of “limited-ductility SPSW” by comparing effective stress contours and average angle of diagonal tension field action at different locations across the web plate. Then, this SPSW was redesigned as a ductile SPSW in compliance with the 2016 AISC Seismic Provisions (AISC, 2016a) to have fully restrained beam-to-column connections and analyzed using strip models and finite element models, respectively. The AISC moment-axial force interaction equation was used to compare demands in the SPSW boundary elements obtained from the strip and finite element models. With respect to the use of a single angle in design, it is shown that using an inclination angle of 45° is slightly (but not significantly) more conservative than using 40° as far as boundary element design is concerned. On the basis of these observations, along with findings from previous research on the diagonal tension field inclination angle, it is recommended that a single constant angle of either 40°or 45° be used for the design of SPSW.

Original languageEnglish
Pages47-61
Number of pages15
Volume56
No1
Specialist publicationEngineering Journal
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Ductile design
  • Field
  • Inclination angle
  • LS-DYNA
  • Plate
  • Seismic design
  • Shear
  • Steel
  • Tension
  • Wall

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Complementary evaluation of diagonal tension field inclination angle in steel plate shear walls'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this