Abstract
When forecasting aggregate variables, a choice must often be made to either add up individual forecasts made at a disaggregate level or to simply forecast at the aggregate level. The presence of heterogeneity introduces aggregation bias and makes the disaggregates approach more preferable, while the presence of data and specification errors introduces relatively large variances in the disaggregate forecasts, making the aggregate approach more preferable. It is suggested that the mean square error is useful in evaluating the combined effects of heterogeneity and specification and data errors, and in facilitating comparisons between aggregate and disaggregate approaches to aggregate variable forecasting.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 373-380 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Socio-Economic Planning Sciences |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 5-6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1983 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparisons of aggregate variable forecasts using aggregate and disaggregate models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver