Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of the efficacy of IGIV-C, 10% (caprylate/chromatography) and IGIV-SD, 10% as replacement therapy in primary immune deficiency: A randomized double-blind trial

  • Chaim M. Roifman
  • , Harry Schroeder
  • , Melvin Berger
  • , Ricardo Sorensen
  • , Mark Ballow
  • , Rebecca H. Buckley
  • , Anita Gewurz
  • , Phillip Korenblat
  • , Gordon Sussman
  • , Georg Lemm
  • , Mark Stein
  • , Donald Stark
  • , Maria Louisa Ermitano
  • , Anne Desroches
  • , Bruce Mazer
  • , Joseph Church
  • , Zuhair Ballas
  • , Alexandra Filipovich
  • , Gilbert Friday
  • , Donatella Graffino
  • Melvin Haysman, Alan Knutsen, Wendel Richmond, Arye Rubinstein, Frederick Marquinez, Don McNeil, Susanne Skoda-Smith
  • University of Toronto
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center
  • Duke University
  • Rush University Medical Center
  • Clinical Research Center
  • Bayer AG
  • Allerg. Assoc. of the Palm Beaches
  • Sainte-Justine Hospital University Center
  • University of Iowa
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • Asthma
  • Saint Louis University
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine
  • University of Florida

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

120 Scopus citations

Abstract

A novel method of large-scale chromatography has been developed to improve recovery and purity of immunoglobulin G (IgG) from pooled plasma. The current study compares safety, toxicity and efficacy of two intravenous immunoglobulin products: a novel formulation, IGIV caprylate/chromatography (IGIV-C; Gamunex™, 10%) and a licensed solvent/detergent-treated product, Gamimune®N, 10% (IGIV-SD). The study, a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, therapeutic equivalence trial, was conducted at 25 treatment centers in Canada and the United States. Patients (n=172) having confirmed chronic primary immunodeficiency (PID), aged 1-75 years, and receiving IGIV therapy were enrolled. For 9 months, patients were treated with IGIV-C or IGIV-SD in accordance with the patient's individualized treatment regimen utilized before study entry. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥1 validated acute sinopulmonary infection during the treatment period. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients with all infections, time to first infection, annual infection rates, lung function parameters, infusion-related safety and viral safety. The annual validated infection rate in the IGIV-C group was 0.18 compared to 0.43 in the IGIV-SD group (p=0.023). Nine patients receiving IGIV-C experienced validated infections, compared to 17 patients in IGIV-SD group (p=0.06). Acute sinusitis (validated plus clinically defined) was less frequent in the IGIV-C group (p=0.012). Presence of bronchiectasis did not affect efficacy. Adverse reactions were similar in frequency and severity in both groups. No evidence of viral transmission was observed. IGIV-C appears to be superior to IGIV-SD in preventing validated sinopulmonary infections, especially acute sinusitis, in patients with PID.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1325-1333
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Immunopharmacology
Volume3
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2003

Keywords

  • IgG
  • IGIV
  • Immunoglobulin
  • Immunotherapy
  • IVIG
  • Primary immunodeficiency
  • Sinopulmonary infection
  • Sinusitis
  • Viral safety

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the efficacy of IGIV-C, 10% (caprylate/chromatography) and IGIV-SD, 10% as replacement therapy in primary immune deficiency: A randomized double-blind trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this