Comparison of Survivorship Care Guidelines for Patients With Lymphoma: Recommendations for Harmonization and Future Research Agenda

PURPOSE Lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of diseases that develop in individuals of all ages and have variable prognoses. Improved survival resulting from therapy advances has led to the emergence of diverse late effects. Although several (US)-based organizations have developed survivorship guidelines, the distinct features of lymphoma subtypes and diverse therapies used raise concerns regarding their applicability to lymphoma survivors. We compared survivorship recommendations (outside primary disease monitoring) between US clinical guidelines. METHODS We extracted information from 17 guidelines from five US-based organizations: ASCO (n = 11), American Cancer Society (n = 1), Childrens Oncology Group (n = 1), Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (n =1), and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (n = 3). Guidelines were evaluated to determine whether they offer recommendations on physical effects, psychosocial and quality of life (QOL), and health promotion and prevention. Comparisons were focused on second primary malignancy, cardiovascular complications, and vaccination. RESULTS Survivorship recommendations on physical effects and psychosocial and QOL mainly differ in the timing and approaches for screening. Vaccination recommendations were primarily derived from other cancer populations. Identified research gaps were a lack of understanding of the risk of late effects across lymphoma subtypes, the role of social determinants of health in survivorship, and the lack of a survivorship caremodel that integrates lymphomasubtypes and treatment exposures. CONCLUSION This study raises awareness about the complexity and challenges of managing survivors under the umbrella diagnosis of lymphoma. The inconsistency and incompleteness of existing guidelines may lead to suboptimal survivorship care. We propose expert-based research priorities to address gaps and unmet needs to help develop risk-based follow-up recommendations to optimize survivorship care for lymphoma survivors.