Abstract
Frequency selectivity was examined in normal-hearing chinchlllas using psychophysical and evoked-potential tuning curves. The acoustic conditions and masking procedures used for the evoked-potential and psychophysical studies were nearly identical. Frequency selectivities as measured by psychophysical and physiologic techniques were quite similar across different probe frequencies. The results suggest that the relatively efficient evoked-potential procedure may be substituted for the time-consuming psychophysical paradigm. Furthermore, the results are consistent with the view that tuning takes place primarily at the auditory periphery.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 408-416 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1982 |
Keywords
- Evoked response
- Frequency selectivity
- Tuning curves
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of psychophysical and evoked-potential tuning curves in the chinchilla'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver