Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of Pediatric Severe Sepsis Managed in U.S. and European ICUs

  • Sepsis PRevalence, OUtcomes, and Therapies Study Investigators and Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators Network
  • Yale University
  • University of Southern California
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust
  • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
  • Royal Hospital for Sick Children
  • Sydney Children's Hospital
  • University of Malaya
  • Children’s Health Queensland
  • Royal Children's Hospital Brisbane
  • Universidad Andrés Bello
  • Hospital Padre Hurtado
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  • McGill University
  • Sainte-Justine Hospital University Center
  • Provincial Health Services Authority
  • Hospital Cardiovascular de Puerto Rico y el Caribe
  • San Jorge Children's Hospital
  • University Pediatric Hospital
  • Akron Children's Hospital
  • Amplatz Children's Hospital
  • Arkansas Children's Hospital
  • Boston Children's Hospital
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Children's Hospital-Hackensack
  • Children's Mercy Hospital
  • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
  • Children's Hospital in Minnesota
  • Children's Hospital St. Paul
  • Children's Hospital Colorado
  • Children's Hospital New Orleans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: Pediatric severe sepsis remains a significant global health problem without new therapies despite many multicenter clinical trials. We compared children managed with severe sepsis in European and U.S. PICUs to identify geographic variation, which may improve the design of future international studies. Design: We conducted a secondary analysis of the Sepsis PRevalence, OUtcomes, and Therapies study. Data about PICU characteristics, patient demographics, therapies, and outcomes were compared. Multivariable regression models were used to determine adjusted differences in morbidity and mortality. Setting: European and U.S. PICUs. Patients: Children with severe sepsis managed in European and U.S. PICUs enrolled in the Sepsis PRevalence, OUtcomes, and Therapies study. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: European PICUs had fewer beds (median, 11 vs 24; p < 0.001). European patients were younger (median, 1 vs 6 yr; p < 0.001), had higher severity of illness (median Pediatric Index of Mortality-3, 5.0 vs 3.8; p = 0.02), and were more often admitted from the ward (37% vs 24%). Invasive mechanical ventilation, central venous access, and vasoactive infusions were used more frequently in European patients (85% vs 68%, p = 0.002; 91% vs 82%, p = 0.05; and 71% vs 50%; p < 0.001, respectively). Raw morbidity and mortality outcomes were worse for European compared with U.S. patients, but after adjusting for patient characteristics, there were no significant differences in mortality, multiple organ dysfunction, disability at discharge, length of stay, or ventilator/vasoactive-free days. Conclusions: Children with severe sepsis admitted to European PICUs have higher severity of illness, are more likely to be admitted from hospital wards, and receive more intensive care therapies than in the United States. The lack of significant differences in morbidity and mortality after adjusting for patient characteristics suggests that the approach to care between regions, perhaps related to PICU bed availability, needs to be considered in the design of future international clinical trials in pediatric severe sepsis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)522-530
Number of pages9
JournalPediatric Critical Care Medicine
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Keywords

  • Europe
  • children
  • management
  • outcome
  • pediatric intensive care unit
  • shock

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Pediatric Severe Sepsis Managed in U.S. and European ICUs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this