Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of mortality between private for-profit and private not- for-profit hemodialysis centers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • P. J. Devereaux
  • , Holger J. Schünemann
  • , Nikila Ravindran
  • , Mohit Bhandari
  • , Amit X. Garg
  • , Peter T.L. Choi
  • , Brydon J.B. Grant
  • , Ted Haines
  • , Christina Lacchetti
  • , Bruce Weaver
  • , John N. Lavis
  • , Deborah J. Cook
  • , David R.S. Haslam
  • , Terrence Sullivan
  • , Gordon H. Guyatt
  • McMaster University
  • University of Toronto
  • Western University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

164 Scopus citations

Abstract

Context: Private for-profit and private not-for-profit dialysis facilities provide the majority of hemodialysis care in the United States. There has been extensive debate about whether the profit status of these facilities influences patient mortality. Objective: To determine whether a difference in adjusted mortality rates exists between hemodialysis patients receiving care in private for-profit vs private not-for-profit dialysis centers. Data Sources: We searched 11 bibliographic databases, reviewed our own files, and contacted experts in June 2001-January 2002. In June 2002, we also searched PubMed using the "related articles" feature, SciSearch, and the reference lists of all studies that fulfilled our eligibility criteria. Study Selection: We included published and unpublished observational studies that directly compared the mortality rates of hemodialysis patients in private for-profit and private not-for-profit dialysis centers and provided adjusted mortality rates. We masked the study results prior to determining study eligibility, and teams of 2 reviewers independently evaluated the eligibility of all studies. Eight observational studies that included more than 500000 patient-years of data fulfilled our eligibility criteria. Data Extraction: Teams of 2 reviewers independently abstracted data on study characteristics, sampling method, data sources, and factors controlled for in the analyses. Reviewers resolved disagreements by consensus. Data Synthesis: The studies reported data from January 1, 1973, through December 31, 1997, and included a median of 1342 facilities per study. Six of the 8 studies showed a statistically significant increase in adjusted mortality in for-profit facilities, 1 showed a nonsignificant trend toward increased mortality in for-profit facilities, and 1 showed a nonsignificant trend toward decreased mortality in for-profit facilities. The pooled estimate, using a random-effects model, demonstrated that private for-profit dialysis centers were associated with an increased risk of death (relative risk, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.13; P<.001). This relative risk suggests that there are annually 2500 (with a plausible range of 1200-4000) excessive premature deaths in US for-profit dialysis centers. Conclusions: Hemodialysis care in private not-for-profit centers is associated with a lower risk of mortality compared with care in private for-profit centers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2449-2457
Number of pages9
JournalJAMA
Volume288
Issue number19
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 20 2002

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of mortality between private for-profit and private not- for-profit hemodialysis centers: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this