Abstract
An air-fireable, glass-free, electrically conductive thick-film material (96.6% Ag, 1.38% Cu, 0.28% Al, 0.35% Ti, and 1.39% Sn by weight) and a conventional glass-containing, electrically conductive thick-film material (96.6% Ag and 3.4% glass frit by weight), both on alumina substrates, were studied by electrical, mechanical, thermal, and microscopic methods. The volume electrical resistivity of the glass-free thick film (2.5 × 10 -6 Ω·cm, 30-μm thick) is lower than that of the glass-containing thick film (3.9 × 10-6 Ω·cm, 19-μm thick), with each film processed at its optimum firing temperature. The optimum firing temperature is 930°C and 850°C for glass-free and glass-containing thick films, respectively, as indicated by the criteria of low resistivity and high scratch resistance. The glass-free thick film has a higher scratch resistance than the glass-containing thick film, both fired at their respective optimum temperatures, suggesting that the former has higher bond strength to the alumina substrate. The formation process of the glass-free and glass-containing thick films is similar. The process involves solid-state diffusion of silver, which results in a silver network and grain boundaries. However, the sintering of silver particulates in the glass-containing thick film is enhanced by the viscous flow of glass.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 194-202 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of Electronic Materials |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2004 |
Keywords
- Air-fireable
- Electrical conductor
- Glass-free
- Thick film
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative Study of Electrically Conductive Thick Films with and without Glass'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver