Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinical effectiveness of CRT and ICD therapy in heart failure patients by racial/ethnic classification: Insights from the improve HF registry

  • Boback Ziaeian
  • , Yan Zhang
  • , Nancy M. Albert
  • , Anne B. Curtis
  • , Mihai Gheorghiade
  • , J. Thomas Heywood
  • , Mandeep R. Mehra
  • , Christopher M. O'Connor
  • , Dwight Reynolds
  • , Mary Norine Walsh
  • , Clyde W. Yancy
  • , Gregg C. Fonarow
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Medtronic, Inc.
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Northwestern University
  • Scripps Clinic
  • Harvard University
  • Duke University
  • University of Oklahoma
  • St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have demonstrated benefit for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); yet, questions have been raised with regard to the benefit of device therapy for minorities. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical effectiveness of CRT and ICD therapies as a function of race/ethnicity in outpatients with HFrEF (ejection fraction ≤35%). METHODS: Data from IMPROVE HF (Registry to Improve the Use of Evidence-Based Heart Failure Therapies in the Outpatient Setting) were analyzed by device status and race/ethnicity among guideline-eligible patients for mortality at 24 months. Multivariate Generalized Estimating Equations analyses were conducted, adjusting for patient and practice characteristics. RESULTS: The ICD/cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (CRT-D)-eligible cohort (n = 7,748) included 3,391 (44%) non-Hispanic white, 719 (9%) non-Hispanic black, and 3,638 (47%) other racial/ethnic minorities or race-not-documented patients. The cardiac resynchronization pacemaker (CRT-P)/CRT-D-eligible cohort (n = 1,188) included 596 (50%) non-Hispanic white, 99 (8%) non-Hispanic black, and 493 (41%) other/not-documented patients. There was clinical benefit associated with ICD/CRT-D therapy (adjusted odds ratio: 0.64, 95% confidence interval: 0.52 to 0.79, p = 0.0002 for 24-month mortality), which was of similar proportion in white, black, and other minority/not-documented patients (device-race/ethnicity interaction p = 0.7861). For CRT-P/CRT-D therapy, there were also associated mortality benefits (adjusted odds ratio: 0.55, 95% confidence interval: 0.33 to 0.91, p = 0.0222), and the device-race/ethnicity interaction was not significant (p = 0.5413). CONCLUSIONS: The use of guideline-directed CRT and ICD therapy was associated with reduced 24-month mortality without significant interaction by racial/ethnic group. Device therapies should be offered to eligible heart failure patients, without modification based on race/ethnicity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)797-807
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume64
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 26 2014

Keywords

  • cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • clinical effectiveness
  • heart failure
  • mortality
  • race/ethnicity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical effectiveness of CRT and ICD therapy in heart failure patients by racial/ethnic classification: Insights from the improve HF registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this