Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Citizen silence: Missed opportunities in citizen science

  • Damon M. Hall
  • , Pedro M. Avellaneda-Lopez
  • , Darren L. Ficklin
  • , Jason H. Knouft
  • , Christopher Lowry
  • Northeastern University
  • San Francisco Estuary Institute
  • Indiana University Bloomington
  • Saint Louis University
  • National Great Rivers Research and Education Center

Research output: Contribution to journalShort surveypeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Citizen science is personal. Participation is contingent on the citizens' connection to a topic or to interpersonal relationships meaningful to them. But from the peer-reviewed literature, scientists appear to have an acquisitive data-centered relationship with citizens. This has spurred ethical and pragmatic criticisms of extractive relationships with citizen scientists. We suggest five practical steps to shift citizen-science research from extractive to relational, reorienting the research process and providing reciprocal benefits to researchers and citizen scientists. By virtue of their interests and experience within their local environments, citizen scientists have expertise that, if engaged, can improve research methods and product design decisions. To boost the value of scientific outputs to society and participants, citizen-science research teams should rethink how they engage and value volunteers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)319-321
Number of pages3
JournalBioScience
Volume74
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2024

Keywords

  • community science
  • crowdsourcing
  • inclusivity
  • public engagement
  • societal benefits

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Citizen silence: Missed opportunities in citizen science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this