Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Circulating endothelial signatures correlate with worse outcomes in COVID-19, respiratory failure and ARDS

  • IMPACC Network
  • , CAFPINT Site investigators of the PALISI Network
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • University of Southern California
  • Boston Children's Hospital
  • Harvard University
  • The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
  • University of Texas at Austin
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • Emory University
  • Drexel University
  • Yale University
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • University of Florida
  • University of Washington
  • University of Oklahoma
  • Oregon Health and Science University
  • Stanford University
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • University of Arizona
  • Immunai Inc.
  • La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology
  • National Institutes of Health

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Elevated circulating endothelial cells (CECs), released from monolayers after insult, have been implicated in worse outcomes in ARDS and COVID-19, however there is no consensus proteomic phenotype that define CECs. We queried whether a transcriptomic approach would alternatively support the presence of endothelial cells in circulation and correlate with worsening respiratory failure. Methods: To test whether elevated endothelial cell signatures (ECS) in circulation plays a role in worse respiratory outcomes, we used unsupervised bulk-transcriptome deconvolution to quantify ECS% in two cohorts. Our pilot analysis included pediatric patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (CAF-PINT, NCT01892969). Our validation cohort included adult hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (IMPACC, NCT04378777), testing the association of ECS% to outcomes in patients at risk of acute respiratory failure/ARDS. Primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Results: In CAF-PINT, day 0 ECS% was higher in non-survivors compared to survivors of respiratory failure (2.8%, IQR 2.4–3.4% versus 2.6%, IQR 2.2–3.0% n = 244, p < 0.05, Wilcoxon rank-sum). In IMPACC, baseline ECS% (< 72 h of hospitalization) was higher in COVID-19 non-survivors versus survivors (2.9%, IQR 2.6–3.4%, versus 2.7%, IQR 2.3–3.1%, n = 932, p < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank-sum). Each 1% increase in baseline ECS% was significantly associated with mortality (adjusted OR 1.36, CI 1.03–1.79) by multivariable logistic regression. Increased baseline ECS% was associated with worse respiratory trajectories (2.5%, IQR 2.2–2.8% for trajectory with no oxygen requirements, 2.9%, IQR 2.6–3.4% for the trajectory with fatal outcome by day 28, n = 932, p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA). Conclusion: Quantifying ECS by deconvolution supports a transcriptomics-driven approach towards the non-invasive evaluation of endothelial damage in respiratory outcomes. This is a first step towards elucidating mechanistic components linking endothelial damage to ARDS utilizing non-invasive, circulating transcriptomic data by leveraging a novel deconvolution approach.

Original languageEnglish
Article number432
JournalCritical Care
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Circulating endothelial signatures correlate with worse outcomes in COVID-19, respiratory failure and ARDS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this