Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Circling the Square: Geometry, Masculinity, and the Norms of Antony and Cleopatra

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Mazzio’s chapter demonstrates how writers aligned ideal and potentially replicable masculinities with properties of the geometric square, how Renaissance dramas could expose potentially harmful ideologies of ‘squares’ and ‘squaring,’ and how Antony and Cleopatra offers Shakespeare’s most powerful critique of the normalizing logic of the square. Opening with the etymology of ‘enormous,’ meaning ‘out of square,’ Antony’s description of having ‘not kept [his] square’ while in Egypt with Cleopatra, and the legacy of Aristotle’s ‘square man’ in early modernity, Mazzio then examines productive tensions between the square and circle for exposing otherwise supressed vulnerabilities of ‘normal’ masculinity. For Shakespeare, moreover, the geometric foundations of ‘measure’ and identity in Rome find their origin (not simply opposite) in Egypt, where Cleopatra establishes an alternative geometry of masculinity.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPalgrave Shakespeare Studies
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages33-67
Number of pages35
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

Publication series

NamePalgrave Shakespeare Studies
ISSN (Print)2731-3204
ISSN (Electronic)2731-3212

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Circling the Square: Geometry, Masculinity, and the Norms of Antony and Cleopatra'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this